As I started to
read the Preface of Literacy with an Attitude by Patrick Finn, I was confused
and stunned at the same time. This
reading really confused me in so many ways that I did not like it that much. What
I got from this reading was that is was forced on the working-class families
and their kids and how they learn and taught.
I would like to use Marisa Blog as extended comments in this blog.
Marisa states
in the first quotes that she posted which was: “The working-class children were learning to follow directions and do
mechanical work, low-paying work, but at the same time they were learning to
resist authority in ways sanctioned by their community. The middle class
children were learning to follow orders and do the mental work that keeps
society producing and running smoothly. They were learning that if they
cooperated they would have the rewards that well-paid, middle-class work that
makes possible outside the workplace (20)” that this reminded her of the
“separate but equal” discussion that we had last week. I agree with her 100%. Families that are in better areas get better
schooling and families in lower income areas do not get a good solid education. The kids are still in school trying to get a
education (equal) but they are getting different education based on the income
of their family (separate).
I also like when
Marisa pointed out this point in her blog saying “This also reminds me of Delpit because
working-class students are not taught the codes of power in their classroom,
and do not understand why they are doing the work they are assigned. On the
other hand, middle-class students typically understand that if they do their
work and succeed in school, they will get a good job and do better financially
in life”. As I was reading I noticed many Delpit moments that most of this kids
need to learn to become great educators and great citizens as they get
older. It crazy how both sides can be separate
but equal.
I thought it was
interesting how the author brought in the saying and asking kids “what is
knowledge”? I found that the answers
from the different students were interesting and I found it interesting that there
were so many varied answers. Everyone has
their own option about this answer but these kids need to learn about their
creativity and that is what some schools are missing out on.
Points to Share:
I don’t understand
why all these authors talk about the problems in the schools but don’t try to
fix the problem. I would like to see
what they can do to make both the schools equal.
Hi Victoria,
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree regarding why the authors do not fix the problem. Also, I did not understand how they labeled these students as "working-class" when the kids do not really understand what that means. Moreover, the kids are not thinking about comparing their education with "labor and low-pay." They are just disinterested because there are not many people motivating them or introducing learning in an effective way.
Yes I agree with the both of you, that these kids should not be labeled as working class because they work just as much as the middle class to get their education. And that's true not these kids are not motivated like we were on school becasue the teachers also have to make learning interesting for them. Great Post!
ReplyDelete